Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji … v. The State Of Rajasthan And Others, Supreme Court of India, on 21 January 1963 [1963 AIR 1638, 1964 SCR (1) 561] Ugamsingh & Mishrimal v. Kesrimal & Ors, Supreme Court of India, on 26 November 1970 [1971 AIR 2540, 1971 SCR (2) 836] Vathiar Venkatachariar v. P. Ponappa Ayyangar, (1918) 45 I.C. 959.
The only judgement he could cite in his favour on that day was the one passed by another single judge of the High Court, Justice F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla (now retired after being elevated to the Supreme Court), who had granted permission for rekla race in Pillayarnatham in Thoothukudi district on August 13, 2004.
· Supreme court ban stone crushers in karnatakaarnataka stone crusher federation supreme court stone crusher rulesupreme court judgement for stone crusher indian kanoon 12 mar 2012et price crz rules stone crusher days ago in the karnataka regulation of stone crushers rules, 2012, hereinafter arnataka regulation of stoneore.
A Bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and A. S. Bopanna said the 'pujari', or priest, only holds the land for the purpose of management of the property of the temple. PTI | New Delhi | Sept 7, 2021:: A priest cannot be treated as Bhumiswami (owner of land) and the deity is the owner of the land attached to a temple, the Supreme Court has ruled.
supreme court judgement on using artificial sand. obayya pujari supreme court judgement obayya pujari supreme court judgement The dust product smaller thanmm size is stored mostly in closed, supreme court order on stone crushers in karnataka. Get Price ardra biz crusher sangriabarandgrill
The presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party His Excellency Prof. Pat Utomi today reacted to the latest breaking news in the Nigerian Federation on the supreme court judgement that declared president Goodluck Jonathan winner in a widely disputed election of the April 2011.
Supreme court judgements of 2009, 2009 judgements, supreme court judgements, SC judgements, SC judgements 2009, Supreme Court Judgements of 2009, SC Judgements of 2009 ... 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 ...
Richard Lazarus is the Howard and Katherine Aibel Professor of Law at Harvard University, where he teaches environmental law, natural resources Law, Supreme Court advocacy, and torts. Professor Lazarus has represented the United States, state and local governments, and environmental groups in the United States Supreme Court in 40 cases and has ...
Amresh Pujari, IPS pledged for a Donor Card and set an example to all the participants who were gathered there. There were around 700 participants who gathered for the rally. Students from various institutions like PSG Arts College, PSG College of Technology, PSG Medical College and Research Institute and PSG Paramedical College gathered for ...
In M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, it was clarified by the Supreme Court that "any disturbance of the basic environmental elements, namely, air, water and soil, which are necessary for 'life', would be hazardous to 'life' within the meaning of Article 21 of the Constitution."35. The Supreme Court in N.D. Jayal v.
1 post published by Fighting Legal Terror on May 20, 2011
Excerpt: - karnataka transparency in public procurements act, 1999 (29 of 2000) section 4: [n. kumar, j] notice inviting tender for supply of billing machines, stationeries and other equipments to electricity supply company held, requisite qualification of having 3 years experience in providing similar service would mean experience of providing similar goods to any electricity supply co ...
Subject: Status of implementation of the Supreme Court judgement dated 31.10.2013 in WP(Civil) No. 82/2011 in the matter of Shri T.S. R.Subramanian & Others vs. U01 & Others – Parliament Assurance in Rajya Sabha Unstarred Q. No. 988, answered on 17.07.2014, on 'Amendment in Rule 3(3) of All India Service (Conduct) Rules' – regarding
According to the learned counsel, the High Court while upsetting the judgments of the two Courts below has transgressed its powers conferred on it by Section 25 of the Act. In order to appreciate the arguments of learned counsel, it is relevant to set out the relevant provisions under which the landlord filed petition for eviction of the tenants.
* However, the Supreme Court had on May 2, 2011 stayed the High Court's direction. The same day it had also directed that there shall be a detailed inventory of the articles, valuables, ornaments ...
Supreme Court in its important judgement dated 19.11.2011 (copy attached) has held that workers cannot be forced to work under new management without their consent and in such an event they are entitled to retirement/ retrenchment compensation under Industrial Disputes Act.
Supreme Court Overruled Cases: Overruled By: Elgin Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, "A" Ward, (1978) 111 ITR 287: Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society, New Delhi Vs.
OVER 100 retired bureaucrats across the country will cease to get post-retirement employment after Supreme Court in its recent verdict made it mandatory for Central and State Information Commissions to have at least one judicial member while hearing appeals of information seekers under RTI Act, 2005. A bench comprising justice AK Patnaik and justice S Kumar asked the …
October 18, 2017. November 20, 2019 by. Advocatetanmoy. Supreme Court Judgments delivered in the year of 2009. A. Subair Vs. State of Kerala [2009] INSC 1111 (26 May 2009) A.K. Lakshmipathy (D) & Ors. Vs. Rai Saheb Pannalal H. Lahoti C.T. & Ors. [2009] INSC 1681 (28 October 2009) A.P.Public Service Commission Vs.
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) vide its notification dated February 02, 2021 has issued the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Second Amendment Regulations, 2021. The amendment modifies the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales)
Shashikant S. Pujari (Respondent ) was appointed as a part time lecturer. Allegedly, a teacher would be considered to be a full timer, if he has a workload of 12 teaching periods per week subject to his making good the shortfall by taking additional lectures. Respondent was …
i have gone through all the details of the case & i believe that justice is not given 2 aruna.i want 2 thank the nurses 2 put a strike & a concurrent 7 year term is not enough for ruining a life,not only her life but also her familys life.justice must be given.speak up. people need 2 be united.our school teachers are putting light on this case & making us aware about this case . i want 2 thank ...
8. We find that the High Court has considered the provisions of Sections 2(10) and 47(3) of the Act in the impugned judgment and has held that the Tungars, Purohits and Pujaris need to be represented in the Board of Trustees. Paragraphs 15 and 16 of the impugned judgment of the High Court are quoted hereinbelow: "15.
Narco Tests The Supreme Court gives judgment on banning narco-analysis brain-mapping and polygraph tests on the accused is a big blow to agencies like the CBI which have been using such techniques as important tools in investigation. ... Obayya Pujari v. Member Secy, K.S.P.C.B., Bangalore, AIR 1999 Kant 157 at 161. ... Violation of this duty ...
That pursuant to the directions of this Court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Obayya Pujari, safer zones for location of stone crushing units have to be notified. That by Notification dated 12.10.2012 respondent No.3 has declared safer zone in D.K.District.
Status of implementation of the Supreme Court judgement dated 31.10.2013 in WP(Civil) No. 82/2011 ; Dopt clarification orders on the case of State Civil Services (SCS) officers : Clarifications in the wake of Punjab & Haryana High Court order dated 1.2.2010 in CWP No. 15798 of …
challenge the judgment and order dated 2.5.2018 in Writ Petition (C)No.7053/2011. In the impugned judgment, the High Court of Orissa has substituted the punishment of discharge for the respondent, to compulsory retirement and to this extent modified the order dated 2.12.2010 whereunder, the Orissa Administrative Page 1 of 15
Oral Judgment 1. This appeal is being pursued by legal representative of the convict questioning the conviction recorded by the learned Special Judge, Sangli, for the offences under Sections 7, 13(1) (d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, sentencing the appellant to suffer R.I. for one year on each count and fine of Rs.1,000/- each on the two counts or in default R.I. for one ...
Judgment IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2909-2913 OF 2005 Lanka Venkateswarlu (D) by LRs. .. Ap...
The Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal 969 of 2011 in the case of SEBI Vs. Rakhi Traders (P) Ltd (with Civil Appeal No.3174- 3177 of 2011 and Civil Appeal No.3180 of 2011) vide its order dated 08.02.18 observed as follows: